


🛡️ Protect your vinyl, preserve your vibe.
Vinyl Styl Protective Outer Record Sleeves offer a premium 3 mil poly shield in a crystal-clear, no-flap design sized at 12.75 x 12.75 inches. This 100-pack bulk set is engineered to fit standard single and gatefold LP jackets perfectly, ensuring your vinyl collection stays pristine and dust-free while maintaining easy storage and handling.






| ASIN | B00CSV9E42 |
| Brand | Vinyl Styl |
| Color | Clear |
| Customer Reviews | 4.6 4.6 out of 5 stars (877) |
| Date First Available | 3 April 2013 |
| Item Weight | 1.11 Kilograms |
| Manufacturer | Vinyl Styl |
| Manufacturer Part Number | VNST72271 |
| Material Type | Vinyl |
| Model number | 72271 |
| Product Dimensions | 33.78 x 17.78 x 3.81 cm; 1.11 kg |
| Sheet Size | 12.75 x 12.75 inches |
| Size | No Size |
T**M
Great product 👌
J**.
Muy útiles para conservar las portadas de mi colección de Lp's.
H**R
Let me just start off by saying that the Vinyl Style sleeves are great. They seem very durable and are big enough to accommodate double/triple vinyl sets. My review is simply meant to provide an answer to a question I posted before ordering my Vinyl Styl 100 pack, which was "what's the difference between these and the Big Fudge outer sleeves?" I didn't get the answer I was looking for, so I hope my comparison is helpful. Here are my observations about the two: 1) Size: the Vinyl Styl (VS) sleeves are about 1/4" bigger (so 1/8" on all sides) than the Big Fudge (BF) ones. This is great for thicker albums (2-4 records), but I found them to be tad too loose for my personal tastes when it came to placing my regular 1 record albums in them. I think I prefer to have the slightly more "snug" fit of the Big Fudge sleeves, but then again, that could also be because I'm just used to that sizing. You may prefer the looser fit of Vinyl Styl. 2) Look: the VS sleeves have more opacity than the BF ones, which lean more towards being fully transparent. VS sleeves have a slightly white/milky look to them, whereas the BF ones lean more towards being crystal clear. I tried to take pic of the two side by side so you can see. They're not the best pics, but please feel free to refer to them so you can get an idea of what I'm talking about. I've gotten used to my BF ones, so I have a preference for that particular look. You may prefer the VS ones. 3) Feel: the VS sleeves have what I can only describe as a slightly more "rubbery", floppy feel to them. The BF ones on the other hand feel a tad more "plasticy" and crisp; the problem I've found with this is that I've had a few tear on the seams, and maybe it was just a bad batch, but BF was quick to replace them for me. In this department, honestly I like that the VS ones seem more durable, but I also like how crisp the BF ones feel. I'm a bit particular when it comes to keeping things uniform throughout my collection, so it's probable that I'll pstick with BF for the rest of my collection. They are both wonderful sleeves however, and the key thing is that I believe both brands will do a great job at protecting your collection. I'm giving 5 stars these, despite the fact that I don't love house loose they are. They're still great sleeves, and the value is unbeatable.
D**L
These are the “soft feel” plastic sleeves best suited for lp records. On a usage note, they are pliable to fit most double thickness record jackets released these days. This 100 pack is extremely good value for money too.
J**Y
I will certainly buy again thanks
Trustpilot
Hace 1 mes
Hace 3 semanas