






📡 Elevate Your Signal Game!
The XRDS -RFKMR400 RF Coaxial Cable is a 50-foot, ultra low-loss coax cable designed for optimal signal transfer with minimal loss. Made from premium copper clad aluminum and durable PVC, it is perfect for outdoor use and compatible with all 50 Ohm devices.








| ASIN | B085G6GH95 |
| Best Sellers Rank | #45,974 in Electronics ( See Top 100 in Electronics ) #130 in Digital Audio Coaxial Cables |
| Brand | XRDS -RF |
| Cable Type | Coaxial |
| Color | Black |
| Compatible Devices | Router |
| Compatible Phone Models | No Compatible Phone Models |
| Connector Gender | Male-to-Male |
| Connector Type | Kmr400 Coax Cable 50ft |
| Data Transfer Rate | 50 Megabits Per Second |
| Date First Available | July 12, 2019 |
| Frequency | 6000 MHz |
| Indoor/Outdoor Usage | Indoor, Outdoor |
| Item Weight | 3.91 pounds |
| Item model number | KMR400 |
| Manufacturer | XRDS -RF |
| Number of Items | 1 |
| Number of Pins | 1 |
| Outer Material | Polyvinyl Chloride (PVC) |
| Package Dimensions | 10.51 x 8.66 x 3.23 inches |
| Recommended Uses For Product | Connecting antennas, satellite dishes, or other 50 Ohm devices for WiFi, CCTV, or amateur radio setups, both indoors and outdoors |
| Shape | Round |
| UPC | 742089210993 |
| Unit Count | 1 Count |
| Wattage | 16000 watts |
K**N
Good for ham radio stations
Works fine, just what I expected in terms of quality and functionality. Used this exclusively for a new tower installation with four antennas.
J**T
Great value at lower price
The KMR400 coax has the same specifications as the Times Microwave standard LMR400 cable but at about 1/3 the price. This cable is constructed similarly to the LMR400 and is similarly a very stiff cable. The cable is not like the Times Microwave UltraFlex version which is much more flexible and has a slightly larger power loss. The connectors solder easily to the KMR cable, but the outer shield wire seems frizzier the LMR. I measured the coax cable loss with a MFJ 259 analyzer and verified the loss was the same as specified which is the same as the LMR. I use this cable for all feedlines outside my ham radio shack. Inside, I use the LMR400 UltraFlex cable. For portable antennas, shorter feedlines and lower frequencies I use the MOOKEERF coax found on Amazon. The MOOKEERF cable is smaller, has more loss and is cheaper.
J**T
Excellent coax for amateur radio antennas
I have installed this to my HF radio antennas and am very happy with its construction, handling, and performance. The center conductor is copper-clad aluminum and so it is a bit lighter in mass than that with pure copper center conductors, and is still a substantial and low loss cable for use at HF frequencies. While the product photo shows a wooden spool, that is not included in the order. What one will get is a nicely wound length of coax for termination by the user. I used crimp-on fittings and am very pleased with this coax cable. No problems or issues at all - it is a drop-in replacement for LMR-400 and RG-8 coax. Recommended! Great value for its price.
R**A
Great cable!
Using this for a 2 meter ham radio application. Running from my roof to my basement and didn't want a poor SWR due to mediocre cable. Easy to work with and jacket and shielding are well made.
J**E
Exactly as shown
exactly as advertised
T**M
Much easier to work with than LMR-400
Much more flexible than LMR-400. Is it the same quality TX/RX as the expensive stuff? I have no idea. But I know it's gotta be better than the bottom shelf stuff most Hams grab first and a lot easier to roll out and run than the even better stuff. Unless I start getting bad signal reports, this stuff will do great.
M**A
Great value comparable with products at a much higher price
This cable performs on par with big name .400 class coax. I was able to test all aspects of the cable and was pleasantly surprised to find all specs to be as published. This is a great product and will buy again. I use this as feed line to all of my HF and VHF antennas. I hope to see long term performance from KMR-400.
C**S
It’s OK, but not as good as times microwave LMR 400
This coax is acceptable. But it does not perform as well as times microwave LMR 400 up in the 440 band UHF and higher. But it seems good for HF/VHF with minimal loss. It doesn’t meet ALL the specs that they give though and I have tried multiple pieces with my test equipment and have found it to not meet there specs, especially in the UHF band when I do a sweep test. But like I said, it is acceptable for HF and VHF, it is just as good as RG 213 or LMR 400 in that frequency range. Most ham radio guys do not buy their coax from Amazon, so it will work perfectly fine for the guys on CB radio that do shop on here. I was just checking out to see if there are any bargains available.
M**G
As close to LMR400 as you're going to get, at less than half the price. I terminated the supplied 100' cable with crimped N types, and hooked it up to a calibrated 8714ES. Losses at some selected frequencies for the 100' supplied: 7.3MHz -0.35dB 14.3MHz -0.61dB 28.3MHz -0.95dB 51.3MHz -1.14dB 70.3MHz -1.26dB 145.3MHz -1.68dB 221.3MHz -2.01dB 435.3MHz -2.88dB 1296.2MHz -5.13dB 1420.2MHz -5.40dB 1575.1MHz -5.72dB 2400.1MHz -7.07dB
R**N
Excellent quality cable, no issues when installing connectors.
N**2
I purchased 100 foot role of KMR400 cable. I checked the insertion loss over the entire 100 foot role by inserting 100 watts at one end at 147 MHz and I measured 70 watts at the other end. Doing the math, that works out to be 1.54 dB over the length of the cable. That is the same performance as LMR400 cable but at half the price. I'd buy the KMR cable again for my next project.
D**D
It's an aluminum center core not copper.. Will not purchase again. Not LMR 400.. not really a good copy
M**Y
Excellent quality. Low signal loss.
Trustpilot
Hace 3 semanas
Hace 2 meses